The Greeks named the sun Helios, but the Romans used the name Sol, which is still in use today. Due to the important role the sun plays in our lives, it has been studied, perhaps, more than any other object in the universe, outside our own planet Earth. Image Credit: SOHO/Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) consortium
Originally published in June, last summer, this post begins to drive home just how hard it had become to have dissenting data surface in the face of the decade long FRAUD that was being advanced by the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU). The depth of the deceit is just now beginning to be understood with information provided when a hacker released 61 megabytes of confidential files from the CRU onto the internet.
Climategate, as this discovery of mass FRAUD is becoming known, created a gusher of money
that flowed into climate research and made clear just how much AGW/Climate Change research professional fortunes became tied to the notion of climate catastrophe. It was the fear of catastrophic climate change, after all, that unleashed the rising ocean of money by which their research came to be funded. Findings that might call the hysteria into question would also put at risk the flow of funds into their field.
This post highlights one force of nature that ALL of the CRU data models purposely left out, and never factored in, due to the level of damage its recognition would have on its cherished money-making Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory.
Click source to read FULL article by Edmund Jenks
Source Link: examiner.com